Restaurant turnover is costing operators nearly $6,000 per employee, according to Cornell’s Center for Hospitality Research.
The problem spreads across generations.
Why younger workers aren’t filling the gap
National Restaurant Association data show quits in the foodservice sector climbing from 598,000 in May to 638,000 in June 2026. The year‑to‑date quit rate sits at 4.3%, a level that typically signals voluntary departures even when the economy is shaky.
Many of those departures come from Gen Z and Gen X staff who expect higher wages and quicker career moves. Restaurants paying $15 an hour or more still struggle to retain them, and turnover in fast‑food outlets can exceed 100% annually.
Industry analysts point out that younger employees often view jobs as stepping stones rather than long‑term commitments. That mindset fuels frequent moves, driving up recruiting and training expenses.
Related: Food Inflation Risks Rise as Crop Prices Soar
Older workers as an untapped resource
Workforce expert Scott Siff, founder of the job‑matching platform Pivoters, argues the issue is less about a shortage of labor and more about overlooking a ready pool of talent over 55.
“We need to update our assumptions about the retirement age and about how long people can continue contributing,” Siff said. “If you’re in the restaurant business and not hiring these (older) folks, you really are missing out.”
He notes that life expectancy has risen from 61 in 1935 to the mid‑80s today, making the traditional 65‑year retirement benchmark outdated.
“If you show up as someone 55‑plus, you’re going to stand out as out of place, and your chances of getting a job – even one you’re totally qualified for – are not very good,” Siff explained.
Siff reports that today’s 65‑year‑olds are as tech‑savvy as people in their mid‑40s were two decades ago. They tend to stay longer in positions and report higher job satisfaction than any other age group.
Related: Sustainable Snacking: Why Traditional Biltong is an Eco-Conscious Choice
Workers 55‑plus are looking for jobs, not careers. When they find a job they like, they stay.
In practice, older hires can translate to tangible savings. Reducing turnover cuts the $5,864 average cost per employee, and stable teams often deliver better customer service, which can improve revenue without raising wages.
Some operators remain cautious. Hiring older staff may require adjustments to schedules, ergonomics, and benefits to accommodate different needs. Yet the potential for a loyal, skilled workforce appears to outweigh these considerations.
Industry observers caution that simply opening the door isn’t enough; platforms and recruiters must actively promote older candidates. Without visible listings and targeted outreach, the existing bias toward younger applicants will persist.
For owners weighing the cost of constant hiring cycles, the data suggest a pragmatic alternative: broaden the talent pool to include those who have traditionally been sidelined. As labor markets stay tight, the argument for hiring 55‑plus workers grows stronger.
